Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, Truth Social, Gettr, X, Youtube, Instagram
According to The Times, British manufactured drones have been repeatedly used to conduct strikes deep inside Russia targeting oil infrastructure in and around the cities of Moscow and Yaroslavl, Volgograd, and the Belgorod region. This is not the UK selling drones to a proxy. This is British drones striking Russian soil. Britain may try to put a diplomatic spin on this, however the UK is directly engaging in an offensive military operation against a nuclear power.
The architects of this policy seem to believe Russia will take this indefinitely.
They should look at what happened to Iran.
For many years, Iran supplied Hezbollah with precision weapons, including missiles, drones, and targeting data. Iran retained the capability to disavow these attacks. They argued that they were a supporter of a resistance, not a combatant. Israel rejected that argument. Israel traced the weapons, struck Iranian weapons infrastructure inside Syria, Lebanon, and eventually inside Iran itself. The principle that Israel established and enforced is clear: if your weapons are killing our people, you are a combatant. Geography and diplomatic cover will not change that.
Britain is now in the same position as Iran, except the target of these weapons has nuclear capability, a permanent seat on the UN Security Council, and is engaged in a stated policy of conducting warfare beyond its own borders.
Russia already responds to the West beyond the battlefield. Assassinations, cyberattacks, sabotage, and targeted infrastructure strikes across Europe have all been attributed to Russian intelligence operations — carried out as a response to Western support for Ukraine. Britain has now transitioned from financial support and advice to active participation in strikes on Russian territory. If Britain continues to move in this direction, the Kremlin may not have a choice.
Parliament and the British public have not been fully informed of the possible repercussions of this course of action. There has been no parliamentary authorization for offensive weapons use against a nuclear power. There has been no honest public accounting of what Russian retaliation against Britain might look like. The political class in Westminster has made this decision in the dark, gambling that the cost of deeper involvement will somehow remain manageable, or perhaps they actually do want a nuclear war.
That calculation may prove catastrophic.
In Western capitals, many believe that Russia will not retaliate directly against a NATO state for fear of triggering Article 5. This has never been tested in practice. Russia has demonstrated throughout this conflict that it responds to provocations in a calculated manner — but it does not accept unlimited provocation without eventually acting.
The war in Ukraine did not have to reach this stage. It reached this stage because Western governments — including Britain — chose escalation over negotiation at every decision point. Weapons transfers grew larger. Targets moved deeper into Russian territory. Deniability became thinner.
Now British drones are hitting refineries outside Moscow.
What comes next is may not be Ukraine’s decision to make.
